Thank goodness for distractions, right? If you are like me, you've been completely sucked in to the dark star that is the 2016 presidential race. It's so depressing, but I can't look away, in part because I genuinely feel it's my civic duty to stay informed, in part because we've just never seen a shitshow like this before. Half of it is noble patriotism; half of it is base rubbernecking. Either way, I need something to take my mind off of it for a while. I have two young boys who wake me up before dawn every morning, so drinking isn't much fun anymore, so I turn to sports and crossword puzzles instead. The Seahawks won a thriller today, and my 17th puzzle will run in the New York Times tomorrow. That should tide me over until the third debate Wednesday evening.
Anyway... the puzzle.
Nonstarter.
Did you know what this word meant before you did this puzzle? I have to confess that I didn’t know the exact definition even after I had completely finished the grid. As I was filling in the clues, I got to NONSTARTER and paused and thought, “Wait… What exactly is a nonstarter?” I had obviously heard the term before, but if you asked me what it meant, I would have guessed something like, “a condition that prevents a deal from being made before negotiations can even begin.” That’s somewhat close. My definition is an example of a nonstarter, but it is certainly not the correct definition (“a person, plan, or idea that has no chance of succeeding or being effective”).
But in this case, knowing the precise definition of my revealer wasn’t that important. What was important was coming up with some good "nonstarters." Ideally, for this type of puzzle – “What do these seemingly disparate things have in common?” – you want three things:
1. At least four non-revealer theme entries (three feels a bit skimpy),
2. Each of these entries relating back to the revealer in a different way,
3. The revealer providing a legitimate “a-ha” moment (the connection is not known by the solver until the end).
I think (hope) I succeeded in each of these. Certainly I got 1 – that's just counting. For 2, I thought of four different definitions of starter – an appetizer, a starter pistol, a car starter, and a first-stringer in sports – and then did my best to come up with the opposite of each of these. The critics have pointed out that MAIN COURSE and LAST LAP are a bit arbitrary, and I can't disagree with them, especially when it comes to the latter. I tried to come up with something better than LAST LAP, but couldn't do it. As for 3, well, I don’t know. It depends on what solvers think. (And since it’s a Monday puzzle, many solvers probably won’t think anything, because they will speed-solve it and be done with it, before they even have a chance to process it.)
But overall, I’m pretty pleased with this one. It’s nothing earth-shattering; it’s likely going to be forgotten a few days from now, but that’s fine. If solvers think, “Hey, nice little Monday,” and then get on with their days – that’s all I’m really going for.
Alright, time for some bullets.
Anyway... the puzzle.
Nonstarter.
Did you know what this word meant before you did this puzzle? I have to confess that I didn’t know the exact definition even after I had completely finished the grid. As I was filling in the clues, I got to NONSTARTER and paused and thought, “Wait… What exactly is a nonstarter?” I had obviously heard the term before, but if you asked me what it meant, I would have guessed something like, “a condition that prevents a deal from being made before negotiations can even begin.” That’s somewhat close. My definition is an example of a nonstarter, but it is certainly not the correct definition (“a person, plan, or idea that has no chance of succeeding or being effective”).
But in this case, knowing the precise definition of my revealer wasn’t that important. What was important was coming up with some good "nonstarters." Ideally, for this type of puzzle – “What do these seemingly disparate things have in common?” – you want three things:
1. At least four non-revealer theme entries (three feels a bit skimpy),
2. Each of these entries relating back to the revealer in a different way,
3. The revealer providing a legitimate “a-ha” moment (the connection is not known by the solver until the end).
I think (hope) I succeeded in each of these. Certainly I got 1 – that's just counting. For 2, I thought of four different definitions of starter – an appetizer, a starter pistol, a car starter, and a first-stringer in sports – and then did my best to come up with the opposite of each of these. The critics have pointed out that MAIN COURSE and LAST LAP are a bit arbitrary, and I can't disagree with them, especially when it comes to the latter. I tried to come up with something better than LAST LAP, but couldn't do it. As for 3, well, I don’t know. It depends on what solvers think. (And since it’s a Monday puzzle, many solvers probably won’t think anything, because they will speed-solve it and be done with it, before they even have a chance to process it.)
But overall, I’m pretty pleased with this one. It’s nothing earth-shattering; it’s likely going to be forgotten a few days from now, but that’s fine. If solvers think, “Hey, nice little Monday,” and then get on with their days – that’s all I’m really going for.
Alright, time for some bullets.
- My goal with this puzzle, as with any puzzle, is to make the non-theme fill as lively as possible while keeping the dreck to a minimum. I think I succeeded in this regard, but you never know. I’m frequently surprised about what other people consider junk. It's all subjective. One entry I would like to have eliminated is C-SPOT. I’ve never seen or heard it used before as a slang term for a $100 bill (“Benjamin,” yes; “c-spot” no), and when I Google it, the top links have headlines like “Women's Orgasm Woes: Could 'C-Spot' Be the Culprit?” But C-SPOT, the money term, is in the dictionary, so I ultimately decided I could live with it.
- ILANA Glazer! It was only a matter of time before she and/or ABBI (Jacobson) found their way into a New York Times grid. They are now pretty big stars, and they have unique names with letter combinations that are very nicely suited to crossword puzzle grids. ILANA with her alternating vowel, consonant pattern might be the best breakthrough for crossword puzzle constructors since OBAMA.
Their show, “Broad City,” is also hilarious. I binge-watched the first three seasons in like a week and a half, and I laughed my ass off. It’s one of those shows that definitely misses its mark sometimes, but even when it does, I often appreciate it in retrospect. Like, sometimes I’d watch an episode, and think “meh…” but then it would pop into my head randomly later and I would find it hilarious, even though I didn’t laugh at all when I was actually watching it. Other times I would just crack up the entire show, like when they answered a personal ad to clean an apartment in their underwear, or the time ILANA was conflicted about hooking up with a hot guy because his improv show was so awful, or... well you can watch the show yourself if you want.
- Shout out to RFK Stadium in my current city of residence, Washington D.C. It’s pretty rundown, but still a good place to watch a sporting event because the sightlines are so good from the cheap seats. I saw the Nationals play there several times before their new stadium opened, and contrary to its reputation, it’s actually a great venue for baseball. The “layered doughnut” shape has gone out of fashion for stadiums, particularly baseball stadiums, because such layouts require big pillars that restrict the views in some seats, but the good thing about it is that if you are sitting in the upper deck you are right on top of the action. The stadiums today are so spread back that if you are sitting high in the outfield, you are way too far away from the action. Seriously, I got some bleacher seats to a Nats game recently and was about to try to stream the game on my phone so that I could actually see home plate. Well, at least I had a $10.50 Coors Lights in which I could drown my sorrows (until my kids woke me up the next morning).
- Given my jag at the beginning of the entry, “Finishes with fewer votes” is a very apropos clue for LOSES. Now let’s just hope the correct man loses in November. I’m talking about Donald Trump, if you didn’t pick up on that. I hate that guy and really want him to lose.
